Hello, friends!

Today, I am sharing my latest essay with GEN.  The piece is a little angry, a little hopeful, and just the teeniest bit snarky. You know, a fun, juicy read about…policy. Truly! It’s about Mitt Romney’s Family Security Act, the most pro-family, pro-child piece of legislation in generations. It’s also deficit neutral. Mitt is a Republican. You’d think his fellow Republicans, members of the pro-life party, would be ecstatic!

They were not.

“In a joint response to the Family Security Act, Sens. Mike Lee and Marco Rubio said in a joint statement, “An essential part of being pro-family is being pro-work. Congress should expand the Child Tax Credit without undercutting the responsibility of parents to work to provide for their families.”

This is so awkward because I thought I was a working parent. While the work I do at home is unpaid, it is work that provides. It’s also work that the country needs caretakers — professionals and parents alike — to do and do well. We are raising the children who will fund our social security. Our children will also pay Lee and Rubio’s taxpayer-funded pension. What I do is work; the homesphere is equal to the marketsphere. My work deserves to be economically valued. Pay me for my work and I can provide in a way the joint senators find acceptable.”

Continue Reading

Thank you so much for reading homeculture. If you liked what you read here, consider subscribing. Think you know someone who’d like this essay? I’d love for you to share it! Join in on the community conversation. We talk a lot on Instagram and Twitter. If you really loved this this piece and want to leave me a little tip? Consider buying me 9 minutes of childcare so that I can keep writing.